With such a busy day of economic developments yesterday, I didn't get around to the one major bit of good news in the Philly Fed's Business Outlook Survey. The two charts below offer clues for evaluating the risk of profit margin squeeze in the current economy. One is the ratio of crude to finished goods in the Producer Price Index. The other is an indicator constructed from two data series in the Philadelphia Fed's Business Outlook Survey through yesterday's release. It is the spread between the Philly Fed's prices paid (input costs) and received (prices charged) data.
A major risk factor for margin squeeze had been the increase in commodity prices over the past several months with the price of oil and gasoline as the dominant factor. But energy prices have been falling dramatically. For example, at yesterday's close West Texas Crude was 28.7% off its February 24th peak. And that has significantly "eased the squeeze" on businesses.
Let's take a broader view of these two indicators by viewing them within the context of inflation as measured by the Consumer Price Index. As the first chart clearly shows, the all-time high in the PPI crude-to-finished-goods ratio was in July 2008, the same month that crude oil and gasoline prices in the U.S. hit their all-time highs. The previous ratio high was in the summer of 1973, a few months before the outbreak of the October Arab-Israeli War and the Oil Embargo. Inflation had already been rising in a series of waves since the mid-1960s. But Middle-East events of 1973 were the primary trigger for the nearly ten years of stagflation that followed.
The latest ratio is at the 90th percentile of the 783 data points in this series. The interim high since the 2008 peak was the 99th percentile in April of last year, but on a percentile basis, the ratio had essentially stalled in the upper 90th percentiles since December 2010, hovering between the 96th and 99th percentiles. The last two months have finally given us a welcome decline below this range.
The Philly Fed Prices Paid Minus Prices Received Index is an extremely volatile series, which I've illustrated by using dots for the monthly data points. The volatility is so great that the value for any specific month can't be taken very seriously. However, to highlight the underlying pattern, I've included a 12-month moving average (MA). The date callouts show that the comparable levels in the past were associated with inflationary peaks. The latest monthly ratio is at the 6th percentile of the 530 data points in this series, a dramatic plunge from the 98th percentile in March of last year. The 12-month MA has now fallen to the 45th percentile.
In fact, yesterday's Outlook Survey report highlights the improvement in margin squeeze in a section headed Price Indexes Decline This Month.
|Indexes for prices paid and prices received both decreased and were negative this month, suggesting that price pressures have moderated notably. The prices paid index fell to -2.8, its first negative reading since July 2009. Nearly 16 percent of firms reported declines in input prices; 13 percent reported increases. Firms also reported that the prices received for their own products fell: For the second consecutive month, more firms reported a decrease in product prices (17 percent) than reported an increase (10 percent).|
By official government metrics, the CPI and PCE, inflation is not a near-term threat. The Federal Reserve has worked hard in the wake of the Financial Crisis to raise the level of core inflation, and not without success, as the latest core CPI (ex food and energy) is now above the 2% target rate at 2.26%. However, the Fed uses the PCE core index as their favored metric, which is at the lower level of 1.89% (latest PCE data through April).
Of course, there are many differences between the inflationary decade of the 1970s and the present, not least of which is the rate of unemployment. In August 1973 (first chart above), unemployment was at 4.8%. The latest unemployment number from the Bureau of Labor Statistics is 8.2%. Also, U.S. demographics today are quite different. The oldest Boomers were turning 27 in 1973. They were at the beginning of their careers with decades of wage increases in their expectations. This year they are turning 66, and many are already on Social Security as their main source of income.
At present, in light of the unemployment rate and the ongoing demographic shift, rises in commodity prices probably pose more risk of continuing margin squeeze than run-away inflation. Some degree of cost-push inflation may be a near-term risk, but the demand-pull inflation we saw in the 1970s is difficult to envision in the U.S. economy of this decade. In fact, there are some in the economic analysis community who see deflation as a more ominous threat.
On the other hand, the volatility of commodity prices, despite their dramatic drop in recent months, keeps the threat of profit margin squeeze on the list of potential dangers.